George Bernard Shaw wrote that Shakespeare was a remarkable ‘teller of stories, so long as someone else had told them first’. If I had – fortunately I do not – to characterise EAI, I would start by paraphrasing Shaw: EAI composers are wonderful teller of sonic tales, as long as someone else has told them before.
However, the precedent sonic narratives, the ones that ‘were told before’, drew on other forms. And this is the jump of the cat of EAI, or the radical EAI that matters, as opposed to extremist EAI. EAI dwells the music aesthetic realm where form gets the primacy over content par excellence, inasmuch as deconstruction techniques, in EAI, are not an option but imperative. In other words, if one aims to inscribe a sound-pregnant work (aka composition) within the EAI niche, one will have to carry out deconstruction even if one opposes the concept (which, by the way, is not monolithical, it varies according o the paradigm it stems from).
This is another — forlorn — green world, also gorgeous, but this time not idealised and performed Brian Eno. Apart from the ironic title, it has nothing to do with Eno’s green reverie. Furthermore, Misters Kelley & Lescalleet, as expected and stressed above, delve into deconstructions of sorts, and they sound powerfully apt at the job.
The release spawns good ideas non-atop, as a healthy mouth produces saliva. The percentage of those good ideas that are unfolded, developed, and taken to grounds where in connection with other blissfully loose ends generate new sonic arteries, is impressively high.
Along these lines, I feel tempted to claim that the set of works comprised in this release belong to the conglomerate kernel of EAI epistemes that enframe some kind of paideuma, which is something all traceable music genres bear without necessarily counting on the awareness of the composers whose works have been thereby agglutinated. The EAI paideuma counting on ‘Forlorn Green’ in its core would be the conceptual revelation space from where we could, within the labyrinthine EAI aural patterns, point out and propose productive distinctions between those patterns that are radical and those that are merely extremist.
By radical I call those components that, showcasing more or less technical knowledge of cause of composers, unsettle common sense (mis)apprehension(s) of the non-music that EAI at the end of the day, when successful, becomes. Whereas extremist are those components that display the composers’ legitimate eagerness to transgress bumping in their technical limitations and self-imposed conceptual misery, generating pieces where presumptuousness is only second to boredom (of the wrong kind).
Standout track is “Conquest of the Earth”. To convey the magnitude of the tragedy it describes and excruciatingly explores, the work would be my pick as support gig for a concert including Sofia Gubaidulina’s “Stimmen… Verstummen”, “Silenzio”, and the gloomiest, sick “De Profundis”.
That would be the perfect eschatological soundtrack for any forlorn, told and retold green dystopian fairy-tale.
I only want to know about fairy-tales that are dystopian, otherwise I will stick to the tedious bites of reality…


